Years of forensic research, thousands of public records requests, and documented evidence of systemic election fraud. Every claim is sourced. Every pattern is verifiable.
Chris Gleason doesn't just make claims. He publishes the evidence.
The forensic tools and analysis that exposed over $250 million in structured contributions designed to evade federal disclosure requirements.
The original forensic analysis platform that identified patterns of structured contributions. Named for "smurfing"—breaking large sums into small, untraceable amounts.
Explore ToolComprehensive analysis of structured donation patterns in all 47 analyzed states, identifying donors with statistically impossible contribution frequencies.
View ReportsCase studies of individual donors—including 80+ year-old retirees making 20,000+ donations totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Read CasesStatistical analysis of micro-donation patterns from elderly, unemployed, and low-income donors that defy mathematical probability.
View AnalysisFull transcripts and video of testimony before the House Administration Committee presenting forensic evidence of structured donation schemes.
Watch VideoWhite House directive on election integrity that cited Gleason's Smurf Hunter research by name, calling for enhanced verification.
Read MemoDocumented violations of the Help America Vote Act of 2002—the federal law establishing minimum election administration standards.
Evidence that counties failed to verify voter identification as required under HAVA Section 303, allowing unverified registrations.
View EvidenceDocumentation of improper provisional ballot handling that violated HAVA requirements for counting and notification.
View EvidenceEvidence that voting systems failed to meet HAVA-mandated accessibility, auditability, and security standards.
View EvidenceAnalysis showing states failed to maintain centralized voter registration databases as required by HAVA Section 303(a).
View EvidenceAnalysis of voting machine vulnerabilities, certification failures, and documented irregularities in electronic vote tabulation.
Technical analysis including documented vulnerabilities, modem connectivity issues, and adjudication rate anomalies.
View AnalysisDocumentation of internet connectivity in voting machines certified as "air-gapped" and incapable of network connections.
View EvidenceSworn affidavits and statistical analysis documenting vote switching and ballot adjudication irregularities.
View ReportsEvidence that voting machines were deployed without proper EAC certification or with unapproved software versions.
View EvidencePublished and unpublished security vulnerability reports from penetration tests and security audits.
View ReportsMachine error logs showing discrepancies between cast votes and reported totals.
View LogsAnalysis of voter registration databases revealing deceased voters, duplicates, impossible addresses, and phantom voters.
Cross-referencing voter rolls with Social Security Death Index to identify votes cast in the names of deceased individuals.
View AnalysisIdentification of voters registered in multiple states who cast ballots in more than one jurisdiction.
View ReportsVoters registered at commercial addresses, vacant lots, parking lots, post offices, and government buildings.
View AnalysisDocumentation of voters with no history, no social footprint, and registrations created within days of deadlines.
View ReportsVoters with impossible birthdays (over 120 years old) and registrations predating state admission to the Union.
View ReportsInvestigation of the Electronic Registration Information Center and its role in voter roll manipulation.
View AnalysisOver 1,200 FOIA and state open records requests filed to obtain documents officials tried to hide.
Searchable database of all public records requests filed, including status, responses, and documents obtained.
Search DatabaseDocumentation of improperly denied records requests and patterns of stonewalling by election officials.
View AnalysisDocumentation of records destroyed before the 22-month federal retention requirement (52 U.S.C. § 20701).
View ReportsCTCL and CEIR grant applications and communications showing private funding of public elections.
View DocumentsThis is what accountability looks like. Help the candidate who shows his work.
Internal communications between election officials, vendors, and outside organizations obtained through public records.
Emails between county election officials discussing procedures, irregularities, and responses to records requests.
View EmailsCommunications with Dominion, ES&S, and Hart InterCivic regarding system access and support.
View EmailsEmails showing coordination between election officials and private grant organizations.
View EmailsEmails between officials and NGOs including Brennan Center and Common Cause showing coordinated messaging.
View EmailsFEC complaints, state and federal lawsuits, and administrative actions documenting election law violations.
Complete copies of formal complaints submitted to the Federal Election Commission.
View ComplaintsElection contest filings, discovery motions, and evidentiary submissions in state courts.
View FilingsFederal court filings including constitutional challenges and Civil Rights Act claims.
View FilingsFormal complaints filed with state Attorneys General requesting investigation.
View ComplaintsCollection of sworn statements from poll watchers, election workers, and witnesses.
View AffidavitsTechnical and statistical expert reports submitted in court proceedings.
View ReportsDocumentation of judicial misconduct, conflicts of interest, and systematic refusal to hear election evidence.
Analysis of 60+ election cases dismissed on procedural grounds without reviewing evidence.
View AnalysisDocumentation of judges with financial ties, recusal violations, and undisclosed conflicts.
View ReportsPattern analysis of courts denying standing to voters, candidates, and legislators.
View AnalysisFormal complaints filed against judges with state judicial conduct commissions.
View FilingsDocumented cases of election officials violating law, destroying evidence, and coordinated efforts to undermine integrity.
Documented cases of Secretaries of State, clerks, and directors violating election codes.
View CasesDocumentation of officials destroying ballots and records before the 22-month retention period.
View ReportsCases of officials illegally denying poll watcher access and lawful oversight.
View CasesDocumentation of officials certifying results they knew to be inaccurate.
View CasesEvidence of cross-jurisdictional coordination to implement unlawful procedures.
View EvidenceDocumentation of officials coordinating with CTCL, CEIR, and NGOs to influence elections.
View EvidenceHow one citizen researcher's work triggered official investigations and policy changes.
Smurf Hunter released
Calls for DOJ investigation
TX, FL, others open probes
Gleason testifies to Congress
Research cited by name
Download original documents to verify claims yourself. Every assertion is backed by primary sources.
Video + transcript • November 2025
He didn't just talk about corruption—he exposed it. He didn't wait for someone else—he built the tools himself. Now he's running to bring that same accountability to the U.S. Senate.
Support the CampaignEvery dollar fuels the fight. Every volunteer multiplies our reach. Florida deserves a Senator who answers to the people.